Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanetball360

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:24, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hanetball360 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent or secondary sources, only press releases and promotional blurbs – the only possible exception (which is unreachable from outside the US so I can't see it) is the Sun Sentinel source, https://www.tribpub.com/gdpr/sun-sentinel.com/ , but a single source doesn't make a concept notable.

The article was very promotionally written with a lot of exaggerated claims; I have cleaned it up and removed several superfluous and inappropriate sources. I have not been able to find any independent sourcing, just press releases and churnalism in English and French. bonadea contributions talk 13:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Florida. bonadea contributions talk 13:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For reference: here is the article before I started cleaning it up, in case someone else finds anything useful in there. --bonadea contributions talk 13:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The WSVN item twice calls the sport "obscure", not a very good endorsement of its notability. I haven't read the Sun Sentinel item because I would have to disable my ad blocker to do so. A Google search turns up a lot of social media and blog posts, press releases, and other questionable sources, but nothing new from reliable sources. Unless someone turns up more reliable sources, I expect to support a delete. - Donald Albury 16:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per submission. Samuel R Jenkins (talk) 05:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:51, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO. A recently invented "sport", and so unsurprising that there isn't enough coverage. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As nothing meeting GNG has been noted, I now support deletion. - Donald Albury 12:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.