Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hallball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. per WP:SNOW Mgm|^(talk) 09:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallball

WP:NFT. Disputed prod. IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable in any way, has no sources of any kind, this is ltierally something someone made up in school one day lol.--Patton 123 21:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete WP:NFT Non notable made up game. Paste (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Unverifiability is not a speedy deletion criterion. Uncle G (talk) 21:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All of the reasons that I expounded in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall Ball apply to this, too. It's unverifiable, and outright false. No, these schoolchildren did not invent the idea of hitting a ball up and down a corridor. (For starters, the prior deleted article at this title, written two years ago by another group of schoolchildren coming to Wikipedia to lay claim to this game, claims that the game of Hallball was invented in 2006. That wasn't true, either.) Delete. Uncle G (talk) 21:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually they're both wrong. Lab ball was invented even earlier. I should know, I played it. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Entirely non-notable, makes frivolous claims. Delete soon. ----Brandon (TehBrandon) (talk) 22:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Unless this is a new version of Calvinball. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 22:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G4) — blatant recreation of deleted material; classic attempt to shirk deletion by recreating article under slightly different name. Nice try. MuZemike (talk) 06:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.