Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakim Dilbar Muhammad Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hakim Dilbar Muhammad Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Article about someone who is claimed to be a notable Pakistani, murdered in a land dispute. No references, nothing relevant on Google. Reading between the lines he may not have been "notable" outside his own immediate locale. Fails WP:RS, WP:BIO andy (talk) 12:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —andy (talk) 12:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sources; reads like a memorial or quasi-advertisement; probably a BLP violation re: those accused of complicity in his death. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to find sources and Wikipedia is not a memorial. Edward321 (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the lack of coverage in sources. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 17:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This book confirms that the subject got a lot of media coverage and there is more coverage in this book. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first book unfortunately doesn't give any sense of the nature and quality of the coverage, i.e. whether it satisfies WP:N still less WP:VICTIM. All it says is "This crime got a lot of media coverage and many stories were being circulated about the way investigation was being carried out." andy (talk) 12:10, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.