Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Millner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 13:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Millner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perennial candidate fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 01:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. His notability is as a business executive rather than a politician. I added some references to clarify this. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He does not pass WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. KidAd • SPEAK 17:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify. He appears to pass WP:ANYBIO, but it's clear to me that the article is not in the shape to be in the article space. This page needs work and I'd be OK with a WP:TNT if it weren't for the article subject's clear notability. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mikehawk10, WP:DRAFTIFY makes it clear that draftifying a 15 year article is an abuse of the process, as a form of shadow-deletion. Curbon7 (talk) 00:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – plenty of GNG-qualifying coverage of his political career, see [1] [2] [3]. The prospect of additional sources about his time in business makes the case for notability all the stronger. I'm puzzled by why draftification would be seen as appropriate: while the article obviously needs expansion, it doesn't seem to have any fundamental policy violations that would justify draftification (which in these cases is generally a backdoor to deletion). Deletion is not cleanup. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.