Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guineans in Sweden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guineans in Sweden

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

more barely sourced cruft - can be adequately covered in Immigration to Sweden, just as the rest of this creators similar stubs. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:10, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Sweden. Shellwood (talk) 17:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, you could just convert this to a draft, if you'd like, Praxidicae. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 20:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it's not encyclopedic and draft space isn't an indefinite holding area. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'm not forcing you to do this at all. There is a small population of Guineans who live in Sweden, even more Senegalese people live in Sweden than Guineans in Sweden. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you're still completely missing the point here. This isn't a notable subject. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not missing the point at all. I'm not saying this is a notable topic or anything. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 20:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So why would we send a non-notable topic, one which you admit is not notable and therefor not suitable for an encyclopedia, to draft space? PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because I believe there is hope that one day, more resourceful information about Guineans in Sweden will pop up on the internet. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 21:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – utter rubbish. The "article" is mostly synthesis (for instance, it contained a list of random people most of whom were not Guinean or not living i Sweden), and the topic obviously non-notable. --bonadea contributions talk 23:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnecessary and farcical at best. Not even any sources to back up the population claim therein. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 03:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Immigration to Sweden, same rationale as with all other mass creations here. MarioGom (talk) 08:51, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I actually will have to agree with MarioGom AmericanEditor350 (talk) 05:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.