Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grounded videos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grounded videos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, no indication of passing WP:GNG; has already had PROD removed, so not eligible for that route. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 19:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I looked and while it looks to be a used term, I can't find anything to show that this is anything other than a WP:NEOLOGISM. It might qualify for an A7, however going through a full AfD wouldn't hurt since it'd give a stronger way to prevent recreation before the term gains coverage. This type of video does exist, however I just don't see where these are particularly noteworthy and something is not automatically notable because it exists. (WP:ITEXISTS) Heck, the amount of results in general are pretty slim, so it doesn't look like it's an overwhelmingly popular type of video - not like LPs, for example. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. no evidence for inclusion in an encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.