Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Besse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 14:10, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Besse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 22:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A quick search indicates that he does have some coverage, e.g., this and this, so I am not sure he fails GNG. 16:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 15:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable ice hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the page needs some cleanup, but there are some good sources linked on the page, an awards of note, as well as the links in the note above. I'm thinking mainly of the USA Today article, which is dead but shows that he has had coverage, as well as [1] [2], [3] and others. Yvarta (talk) 10:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Went through page more closely, and the USA Today is just the high school version. Still some other good state coverage with some curated awards, so I'd still vote keep, even though otherwise he barely passes WP:Hockey per nom. Yvarta (talk) 11:40, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.