Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Haider Raisani Baloch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:38, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ghulam Haider Raisani Baloch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing to suggest improvement, better notability and even current information about your him and searches at all English Newspapers and attempts at Urdu ones found nothing better than here, here and here. There is no article for the Balochistan National Front and there seems to be coverage for it but I'm not sure if it's notable. It's worth noting the article has had hardly any edits and the author was blocked the following month in June 2008. SwisterTwister talk 18:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A person does not get a notability freebie for leading an organization, if adequate sourcing isn't there to get them over WP:GNG. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if something substantive can be written and sourced about him. Bearcat (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX and it's WP:NOTNEWS. Kraxler (talk) 01:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE: fails notability; I associate myself with the rationale of my fellow Wikipedian, @Kraxler. Quis separabit? 18:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.