Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Dean Helms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete GRBerry 16:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Dean Helms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

was put on prod, taking it to afd for fuller discussion. WhoopRoot (talk) 22:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, not notable, only two local news stories, [1]. Plus this should go due to WP:BLP1E. Okay he committed a very sick crime, but he's a young man who maybe has problems, and will be eventually released and want to start his life afresh without this, which is so accessable via google. Sticky Parkin 23:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete same like Gary Dean Helms Jr was deleted. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete He did a sick ugly crime but he wouldn't pass notability and merit an article here for this one crime. This article is a clear case of WP:BLP1E Artene50 (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BLP1E and WP:NOT#NEWS. No trace of RS interest outside October-December 2006. A revolting, and somewhat out-of-the ordinary crime, but strictly a crime news story. Not notable. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.