Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusion Gaming Convention (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fusion Gaming Convention

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable event - fails WP:N. Ironholds (talk) 17:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete [1] is a fine source, but I can't find any kind of reliable second source. If someone can find a non-trivial second source from some other source I'd change to weak keep. Hobit (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Roanoke Times link above was also the only reliable source I could find - everything else is either an enWiki mirror or associated with the con itself. This at least says FGC exists, but that doesn't add anything to the debate. This definitely doesn't satisfy the whole multiple part of WP:RS. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 13:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.