Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Gate to Wire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From Gate to Wire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a column in a local newspaper. No attempt to demonstrate notability. Was converted into a redirect to the town article but that is pointless. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm sure it's an interesting column, but I don't think it's a notable one. Stalwart111 14:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A7 - There is not even so much as a claim to notability here (unless you wanted to stretch and say it's trying to claim inherited notabiity from the races it covers). The article is "This is X. It is Y. It covers Z and is written by A." And that's it. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Simply not notable....William 11:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.