Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresh And Loose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh And Loose

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 02:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Couldn't you have PROD'd it before AfD? Anyway, delete per WP:WINAD. Zappa O Mati 02:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- FWIW, I have something of a moral opposition to PRODs (except for BLPPRODs)... they essentially mean "fingers crossed the creator doesn't log back in within the next week". As long as creators are allowed to un-PROD without leaving a reason, I just see it as a system that takes advantage of new users without signficantly lowering the strain on AFD (since if an AFD doesn't get any comments it can be treated as an uncontested PROD anyways). — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 03:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Delete per NOTDICT. I find many ghits for the phrase, but they are mostly ordinary-language descriptions of things that are, um, fresh and also loose. I don't see any specific concept. Cnilep (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources. No evidence of notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not Urbandictionary. We'll have the full story... at 11! 14:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.