Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franscesco Caruso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:31, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Franscesco Caruso

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CRIME. The article includes claims of infamous notability, but there are no reliable references to be found to support this claim. No results from Google News, Books on the subject besides the LaCosaNostra result listed in the article. --IShadowed 21:08, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:13, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Actually, Google News appears to provide one paywalled article, contrary to the statement in the nomination of none available. Here's [the link]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:42, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One mention in a newspaper does not establish notability, fails WP:CRIME. Moreover, another "contribution" of User:King Genovese or his sockpuppet User:Evan12345678910, a user blocked for the repeated creation of numerous articles on non-notable individuals affiliated with crime.--DonCalo (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Caruso does not pass WP:GNG or WP:CRIME.--Vic49 (talk) 00:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.