Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Angry Men

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Four Angry Men

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While there is some coverage in social media related and fringe, this seems to lack depth or persistence. Contents added under "Roster" is sourced from blogs. Unclear where the results are sourced from. Those poorly sourced items have been removed many times and re-added without commentary. The article had also been moved to draft Draft:Four Angry Men to incubate, only to be recreated in main space seconds later. Propose deletion on both for lack of notability and lack of reliable sources. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 20:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's just because you are not a Chinese web user. I've been watched 4AM's lives and followed their microblog for a long time, the roster and the results are all copied from the official wechat & weibo account, so I can promise that they are all true. I didn't put the result resources on it because some tournament don't have any official website. So please stop removing the contents okay? I'm a 4AM fan and I know them more than you. I won't create a page of team that I don't know.^talk 02:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to see another Chinese E-sports team Royal Never Give Up, then should we both be deleted? ^talk 02:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 20:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 20:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 20:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless stronger evidence of notability is forthcoming – at the moment this does not pass our notability requirements for companies and organisations. I regret that I don't read Chinese, so cannot look for better sources myself; please ping me here if more are found. As for articles about other teams, please read WP:OTHERSTUFF. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.