Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadil Husayn Salih Hintif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Guantanamo Bay detainees. Fails BLP1E - will redirect after deletion (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:49, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fadil Husayn Salih Hintif

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No source to prove that this wp:BIO of a Guantanamo prisoner is notable. also fails WP:CRIMINAL DBig Xray 09:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero wp:notability-suitable references. Two of the "references" are a Wikipedia article. North8000 (talk) 12:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC) I was in error, and also was told that improvement is coming. I will reassess in 1-2 days. North8000 (talk) 22:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't want to jump the gun again, but I lean towards delete. I really don't see the required substantive secondary source coverage of the subject in any of those references. Possibly this should merged into / become a section in some broader article. North8000 (talk) 11:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think the sources as they are are sufficient, As he is not a criminal, And at the very least, it can be merged into a combination article, so deletion is not appropriate DGG ( talk ) 08:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The List of Guantanamo Bay detainees already contains relevant information, if the subject is notable only then it deserves a seperate article, i dont see anything special here. --DBig Xray 09:52, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Anotherclown (talk) 23:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lacks "significant coverage" to establish notability under the WP:GNG. What information there is a List of Guantanamo Bay detainees is sufficient so there is no need for a seperate article. Anotherclown (talk) 23:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Guantanamo Bay detainees. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Guantanamo Bay detainees per the above: there's not enough coverage (or material) to sustain a biography of this person. Nick-D (talk) 02:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Guantanamo Bay detainees per my comments above. Notes on individuals can and should be expanded at that other article; this would be an example. North8000 (talk) 11:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have to agree with DGG, sufficient sourcing.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please do not be misled by the sources, they are not even talking about the subject, and only a few are taking the name. --DBig Xray 15:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- This article was the target of a very extensive, and in my opinion, questionable, excision. I planned to do more work on updating this article. Unfortunately, the contributor who initiated this {{afd}} kept initiating additional {{afd}}, and responding to these {{afd}} has consumed practically every moment of my spare time, and I have not been able to finish my updating of this article -- so I request a relisting rather than a closure. Geo Swan (talk) 09:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly do not attack the nominator. Remember, when you comment, personal attacks and accusations of bad faith never help. (see WP:ADHOM) The article was nominated as it has issues, Also it must be noted that the notability could not be established even after 6 years and suddenly pleas for WP:MERCY and WP:BADFAITH are being made.--DBig Xray 10:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've not studied the article or its refs in any detail, but the relist request seems reasonable considering some of the work necessitated as a result of the various numerous discussions. I'd normally simply relist it myself now, but TBH don't have time at the moment to deal with any resulting questions. -- Trevj (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the article's references are to primary sources, and the few references to secondary sources don't provide in-depth coverage of this person. At best, any claim to this person's notability rests entirely on him having been held at Guantanamo Bay, which of course means that the article fails WP:BLP1E. Nick-D (talk) 11:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.