Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraaa Innings T20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator withdrew in light of the availability of new sources (non-admin closure) Jupitus Smart 15:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extraaa Innings T20

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable studio show, no sources ViperSnake151 Talk 20:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article can be improved by paragraphing rather than its present written style. Found 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 though unsure about the notability of these websites. —Vignyana^talk 15:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This article is about a studio show which analysis prematch conditions of the cricket pitch, atmosphere conditions as well as postmatch outcomes of very notable cricket tournament Indian Premier League per sources cited by Vignyana. The sources are Zee News, India TV, the fifth and sixth source by the user That is Indian Express and Daily Mail are very reliable and reputed passes WP:RS. These sources by the user Vignyana are secondary, independent of the subject and multiple passes WP:GNG. Anoptimistix (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This article has no sources at all. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update - Have added references given by Vignyana in the lead section of the article. Anoptimistix (talk) 16:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've been drafting a revised version of the article, which would take another 2 days to complete. I plan to add the revision under the existing page. Vignyana^talk 18:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just saw what was done, nice work! Consider the nomination withdrawn. ViperSnake151 Talk 05:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.