Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy transfer between semiconductor nanostructure
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete G12: as indicated correctly in the last keep (!), this is a copyvio from a published article. Articles where the whole history contains the copyvio should be speedy deleted, not cleaned up. Fram (talk) 13:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Energy transfer between semiconductor nanostructure
- Energy transfer between semiconductor nanostructure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural AfD. Was prodded under "OR/Potential copyvio". I'm neutral, but prodding would remove a lot of potential mergable material. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 11:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Largely a word-for-word copy of the review article by Rogach and others. We already have a fine article about fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Energy transfer between semiconductor nanostructure could mean anything, so don't redirect. Narayanese (talk) 22:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this isn't an encyclopedic topic as the title is phrased--it's an explanation that's more akin to an essay. Suspect the WP:OR concern is accurate too. JJL (talk) 01:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the three first provided references are reliable Rirunmot (talk) 14:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Largely a copyvio from here. The article needs to be cleaned up, but there is no need to delete it. -Atmoz (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.