Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enemy Image

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 23:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enemy Image (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any sources about this film. Sam Walton (talk) 11:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep – significant topic; hard to find coverage from 10 years ago but rated "outstanding" by Sydney Morning Herald [1] and strong review as well from The Guardian [2]. I'm not sure which publication this article abstract [3] is from - Newsweek? —Мандичка^YO 😜 11:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Despite the sources found this article does not meet WP:NF, the sources found only give trivial litle blurbs with no significant coverage otherwise. JayJay^{What did I do?} 18:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Changed my mind, others have found enough sources to meet WP:NF. JayJay^{What did I do?} 16:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Documentaries are hard to track after their release dates, but this one got good reviews and got distribution. This last is pretty much the equivalent of a studio for a fictional film. Hithladaeus (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Keep per also being covered in Indiewire. While it's unfortunate that the nominator could not find sources with his "WP:BEFORE", others have. WP:NF is met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.