Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emercoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 14:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emercoin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a non-notable cryptocurrency. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. MER-C 11:14, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Standard mentions by non-discerning crypto-magazines. I wonder if for most CC this is a case of churnalism. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 11:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per L3X1. Also read Emercoin#Usage - enuf said. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no signs of notability Jtbobwaysf (talk) 08:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There're many mentions in articles click and click in «Reuters». In Newsweek, in Forbes
Those references are not significant coverage. MER-C 11:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Forbes source is the only none trivial mention and it may have reliability issues considering the promotional tone of the article. W 42 13:37, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.