Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebrahim Hemmatnia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 07:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ebrahim Hemmatnia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability is not clear and provable, nothing important could be found about him in Farsi or English language Mardetanha ^talk 10:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Btw it seems user is asking people in different languages to create article for him, at least several interwiki's has been created in past week in different languages, as far as I can see he is trying to use Wikipedia as source to advertise himself Mardetanha ^talk 10:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think , this article is promotional as Ebrahim Hemmatnia already has become a celebrity and This article is live on Wikipedia by following all guidelines more than 2 years , nothing wrong on this article but why it is nominated for deletion ?

Kalamya (talk) 14:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very strange and doubtful request and the intentions of Mardetanha is not clear. This page is solid and these are just some of the hundred articles and TV items about it in English and Farsi. Here is the list of references that has solid information about the Ebrahim Hemmatnia page:

Digitalexpo 17:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User has only 3 edits, I am pretty much sure he is connected to owner of the page Mardetanha ^talk 18:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete it the page has hundreds of reliable sources where some are collected by editors and some are not. He or she might have not many edits but he /she has a point your (#mardetanha) intentions are for me also not clear because you are trying badly to delete a solid page of a public figure… To be frankly I have some doubts about your honesty in this page . Kalamya (talk) 11:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This page is about a public figure. He holds a world record. Why should we remove it?!

I don’t understand the reason why to delete this page, it seems to me more personal intentions by the requester “Mardetanha” who gives incorrect arguments. I think we must not lose this page. Alexjoest 02:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The subject's meatpuppets need to stop the "But he's a celebrity! I found reliable sources! He's got a world record! Don't delete!" nonsense. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

His article was deleted from Farsi Wikipedia because of notability Mardetanha ^talk 07:45, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Now could you make a steward request on Meta to have the rest of this cross-wiki mess deleted? KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t delete. I’m afraid that you #Mardetanha have used your influences inside Islamic state of Iran to delete the Farsi version of this article, you seem to be an Iranian too according to your user page. Is that right? This is a clear personal or political intention because other languages of this article still remain. I'm now really concerned. One should warn the Wikipedia administration about this suspicious developments.

Kalamya (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.