Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dystopia (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Tone 20:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dystopia (book)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In my opinion, this is not notable enough per Wikipedia's notability guidelines on books (WP:NB). The author doesn't appear to be notable enough for his own article (was deleted in 2019) - and I can't find any independent sources for either the book or the author. Thsoe current sources on the page are mostly references to the book itself, or websites advertising/selling the book (see WP:BOOKSTORE). Seagull123 Φ 15:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. Seagull123 Φ 15:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Seagull123 Φ 15:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Seagull123 Φ 15:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - I agree that there is currently no coverage of the book in reliable sources. However, it just was released in e-book format, and won't be released in physical form for another month, so it could simply be a case of being WP:TOOSOON. Sending it back to draft until its actual full release might be helpful, to see if any reviews in reliable sources wind up coming out in the near future. Rorshacma (talk) 16:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. Agree with above, reliable sources are hard to find. In Google books, the author tells, "reading the book might feel so fragmented"... and I think this book needs more time and responses from his peers in the town planning field.--Whiteguru (talk) 08:27, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per all of the above Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.