Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr.Ahmedaalzagtat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. EdJohnston (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.Ahmedaalzagtat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article at first glance appears to be copyvio, -fails WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And, just when I was writing a deletion rationale, the article was nominated for speedy deletion per WP:G11. If speedy declined, we may discuss the article here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete : Fails WP:GNG. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unreferenced BLP that does not meet WP:GNG.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 23:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.