Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dony Valle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dony Valle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Simione001 (talk) 01:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The topic on the article is not very notable. --Vaco98 (talk) 03:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Subject appears to lack WP:SIGCOV and thus does not meet inclusion criteria. GauchoDude (talk) 13:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 02:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this relisted when consensus is clear? LibStar (talk) 05:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it seems a bit unusual. AssumeGoodWraith what was the reason for relisting as opposed to closing? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need a bit more reason than "not notable" or "fails gng". This afd can still be closed at any time if I made another error. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 03:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you an admin? LibStar (talk) 04:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails GNG is a clear enough reason. It means there aren't enough sources about it to pass GNG. If you can't understand that, you shouldn't be doing admin/experienced editor level tasks like relisting. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.