Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dontay Thomas

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jermaine Thomas (basketball).. Rlendog (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dontay Thomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to pass WP:NBASKETBALL and does not in any other way provide information that might suggest it passes WP:GNG. Quick search turns up a few articles reporting on his signing with overseas teams. JTtheOG (talk) 06:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Actually does meet WP:NBASKETBALL. He played in Liga ACB last year (profile) Merge with Jermaine Thomas (basketball). Same guy. Rikster2 (talk) 00:29, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 07:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect as being equivalent to merging in this case. No idea why this was relisted; the consensus is clearly to merge and redirect. Muffled Pocketed 08:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Yes, can we close this? Makes no sense. Rikster2 (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect per above and this I think has enough comments to be closed. Chase (talk) 21:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.