Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominick LoFaro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Procedural close as no rationale for deletion has been given. Renomination is allowed but only after WP:BEFORE is conducted. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 19:24, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dominick LoFaro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

{{{text}}} ThePlane11 (talk) 00:47, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 03:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. There is no reason suggested for deletion. --Doncram (talk) 04:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Ready to be closed, ASAP. I am not finding, within wp:AFD, where this outcome is explained, but I know it is a regular, guideline-approved approach. This is ready to be closed immediately, by anyone, admin or not. Please do close this. No prejudice against the nominator creating a new deletion nomination at a future date. --Doncram (talk) 05:10, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep – Helped bring down Gotti. Referenced in the Washington Post, New York Times, UPI and New York Magazine to name a few. In addition, profiled in numerous books, to many to mention here. But can be seen here. [1] with regards to the Mafia. ShoesssS ^Talk 14:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep – Article could need a clean-up and additional sources. But it is notable per Gotti association and plenty of sources available.BabbaQ (talk) 14:47, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.