Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog's Pog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 14:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dog's Pog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this programme exists. I found no reliable sources verifying it. Also nominating the article for the cartoon creator, as well the list of episodes and co-creator:

Contested prods. ... discospinster _talk 23:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No references, no assertion of notability, nothing came up when searching for anything with this title. The situation is the same with the article about Noah Hall as well. - Sudo Ghost 14:17, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails the fundamental policy of verifiability in spectacular fashion. -- Whpq (talk) 16:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The fact that apparently Batman and CatDog are in episodes, yet there is no mention of this to be found online, leads me to believe this is a hoax. Batman doesn't just show up in anything, especially without someone online noticing and commenting. - Sudo Ghost 16:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a hoax. Couldn't find any evidence this, or any of the pages created by this user, actually exist. MikeWazowski (talk)

We should also add List of Dog's Pog episodes and Edwin Antonsson for similar reasons. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:43, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Done, thanks. ... discospinster _talk 01:42, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as hoax. (And as non-notable if they were to exist.) By the way, in a quick check of the Swedish population register, I was unable to locate Messrs. Hall & Antonsson, corroborating the idea that all of the articles are hoax. Tomas e (talk) 09:14, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.