Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who: The Card Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cubicle 7. Sandstein 19:30, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who: The Card Game

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a card game is devoid of any WP:INDEPENDENT sources. BEFORE fails to find any RS mentions. Fails GNG. Part of a WP:WALLEDGARDEN involving Cubicle 7 company. Chetsford (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion. How about merging with Doctor Who or else with Cubicle 7? Vorbee (talk) 06:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What would we merge? Nothing in the article has an WP:INDEPENDENT source. Wikipedia is for providing encyclopedic treatment of notable subjects, not for providing carbon copies of a company's product pages. Chetsford (talk) 08:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to Cubicle 7. BOZ (talk) 17:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cubicle 7 and/or Doctor Who merchandise#Card games, unless actual independent sources can be found--doubtful after some Googling. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 20:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Cubicle 7. The GAMA reference is independent. And I've no doubt some specialized press covered that award. Hobit (talk) 15:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (change !vote as nom). After considerable digging among sources that would not appear in a routine BEFORE (Google News, Google Books, newspapers.com, and JSTOR), I was able to turn-up two sentences in an article on ICV2 in advance of the game's launch. Given the date, the source itself is WP:CRYSTALBALL and the purely incidental mention doesn't help establish GNG, however, it does at least indicate the game may have actually existed/exist. Chetsford (talk) 16:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cubicle 7 and redirect, assuming that the Nom drops the stick and withdraws the Cubicle 7 AfD nomination, as he already did for the Man, Myth and Magic nomination. Newimpartial (talk) 21:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cubicle 7, poor sourcing and no real evidence of any notability.Slatersteven (talk) 09:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cubical7 per WP:PRODUCT and per above. Jbh ^Talk 17:19, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.