Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitri Tarabrin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz ^talk 01:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitri Tarabrin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 08:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete does not meet notability guidelines for hockey players, which must be meant for someone only notable for playeing hockey. These guidelines are also way to low, since they allow for keeping articles with one, directory type source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't disagree with the conclusion in this case, but this is a misunderstanding of NHOCKEY (or any specialized notability guideline). A person does not need to meet the specialized guideline if they meet GNG. The specialized guideline only represents circumstances in which there is consensus that the subject is almost certain to meet GNG (or in some cases, not this one, a consensus that they should be deemed notable regardless of GNG). Rlendog (talk) 01:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.