Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diên Niên – Phước Bình massacre
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Diên Niên – Phước Bình massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have been concerned about the non WP:RS sources used and the obvious POV of this page for some time, I first raised a refimprove on this page in 2011. The principal refs are 3 now dead links. I have searched for this supposed event but just find repeats of this page. Mztourist (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and Note that this article has been tagged for sourcing off and on since 2011, with editors removing tag without adding reliable sources. Massacre accusations require sturdy sourcing, and if it's out there for this alleged "massacre" I can't find it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as questionable for the applicable notability and improvements, unlikely to have any further information for this article. SwisterTwister talk 00:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.