Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhaka Dazzlers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dhaka Dazzlers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable amateur sports team. Not enough coverage from reliable sources to establish notability. Fails WP:NSPORTS. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and Bangladesh. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Badminton, and Cricket. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable sports team, very little coverage, none of which would suffice passing guidelines, no suitable WP:ATD also. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – fails notability guidelines with no reloable sources to establish notability. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 16:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete there's not enough documented history or reliable media coverage to establish its notability on Wikipedia.Dejaqo (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.