Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deshawon Nembhard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Please add newly located sources to the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deshawon Nembhard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Belize. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly no search for sources, given that the first page of Google News brings up 1, 2, 3. Giant Snowman 18:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes GNG. No BEFORE was done.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, has enough sources. --Mvqr (talk) 10:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG. 8/9 sources currently in his article aren't independent of Nembhard. amandala.com.bz source is a mention in a squad list. 1 is a match report where the Nembhard specific coverage is "man plays football match" and "has three caps", 2 has a paragraph on Nembhard, takes large quotes from a Football Federation of Belize press release and this article which is a copy and paste of this. 3 contains slightly more on him but nowhere near enough for a GNG pass. Dougal18 (talk) 14:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per GiantSnowman, Ortiesp, and Mvqr. Internatiojallt capped player withn ongoing career and already has good sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.