Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek DeBlois

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derek DeBlois

Derek DeBlois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG per WP:ROUTINE sources. Nowhere close to meeting WP:NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 15:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I searched, and it was full of passing mentions. Fails GNG and BIO. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 17:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Could not find any anything that would indicate a pass for WP:GNG and he fails WP:NHOCKEY -DJSasso (talk) 02:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete:I came up with him being a solid, but not award-winning player at Michigan and a member of the USA (gold medal) team in the 2009 World Junior A Challenge, neither of which meets WP:NHOCKEY standards; he currently plays tier 2 German hockey, and is unlikely to move up. I have vetted him as carefully as I could. Bill McKenna (talk) 21:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per all of the above. He just doesn't come close to meeting any of the criteria needed for an article. Deadman137 (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.