Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Blandino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rlendog (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Blandino

Dean Blandino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two references, one an interview, and the other from the same source lacking the diversity of references needed to demonstrate notability of a BLP. A preliminary WP:BEFORE didn't show much else. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn by nominator I do a lot of AfDs, and this wasn't my proudest. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 00:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not even close to enough to pass the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• It's certainly not even close, but beyond that you couldn't be more wrong. Lepricavark (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Just wow. Carrite (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - while poorly worded currently, and setting aside the significant coverage from FoxSports (as non-independent), there is plenty of other significant coverage from other RS: CBS Sports, USA Today, Sports Business Daily (subscription required), Yahoo Sports]. And that's on the first page. Add to that non-trivial (but I wouldn't call them significant coverage either) in ESPN, Sacramento Bee, Patriots Wire, NBC Sports, among many others, and this wasn't a very difficult decision for me. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Per Onel5969. Like his predecessor/mentor Mike Pereira, Blandino held one of the most important and widely-covered jobs in professional football, and he is now a high-profile commentator. Here is a nice ESPN profile from 2015. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. This really isn't even debatable. Lepricavark (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes GNG. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 17:32, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per all above. Obvious WP:GNG pass. Ejgreen77 (talk) 00:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Huge GNG pass for this head of National Football League officiating. Should have been a speedy keep. Carrite (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.