Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danijal Brković
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Danijal Brković (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested by SirEdimon (talk · contribs) with the explanation "Brković played 13 matches in a fully professional league that guarantees spots to UEFA competitions including Champions League and Europa League, that is, he has notability". However, the Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina is actually not fully pro, as according to WP:FPL. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. This footballer has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league. As such, the article fails both WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I don't understand your criteria. The Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina is not a fully professional league (despite their teams play the main UEFA competitions) and the Cypriot First Division, Egyptian Premier League, S.League, Hong Kong First Division League are, for example, considered fully profesional. To me you just want to delete this article, in fact I do not know why this thread, anyway you always find a way to delete the item that you want to delete. SirEdimon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- I'm not sure I understand the undertones of this statement: "you always find a way to delete the item that you want to delete". If I were wrong in nominating the articles for deletion that I have then they wouldn't have been deleted, quite simply. If the guidelines I cite when proposing articles for deletion are incorrect, irrelevant or whatever then other users would have pointed this out and !voted keep. So I'm not quite sure what you mean by this comment; it's not like I have any control over how other users !vote, so I'm not quite sure how I "always find a way" to get articles deleted. Also, I'd like to clarify that a team competing in a UEFA competition has no bearing whatsoever on the professional status of that team's league. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- My friend I have nothing against you. When I say "you" I refer to the editors in general. I just don't understand the criteria to delete this article, and sometimes it seems that you (the editors) just want to delete the article. It seems that you (the editors) don't to increase this encyclopedia.--SirEdimon (talk) 23:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Some of us actually follow Wikipedia's notability guidelines and whether we like to "increase this encyclopedia" or not is irrelevant. I personally like to increase this encyclopedia by quality, if you don't mind. – Kosm1fent 21:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- My friend I have nothing against you. When I say "you" I refer to the editors in general. I just don't understand the criteria to delete this article, and sometimes it seems that you (the editors) just want to delete the article. It seems that you (the editors) don't to increase this encyclopedia.--SirEdimon (talk) 23:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure I understand the undertones of this statement: "you always find a way to delete the item that you want to delete". If I were wrong in nominating the articles for deletion that I have then they wouldn't have been deleted, quite simply. If the guidelines I cite when proposing articles for deletion are incorrect, irrelevant or whatever then other users would have pointed this out and !voted keep. So I'm not quite sure what you mean by this comment; it's not like I have any control over how other users !vote, so I'm not quite sure how I "always find a way" to get articles deleted. Also, I'd like to clarify that a team competing in a UEFA competition has no bearing whatsoever on the professional status of that team's league. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – fails WP:NFOOTY, as the player didn't play in a fully professional league. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant media coverage. – Kosm1fent 21:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 01:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.