Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangerous (Cascada song) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Evacuate the Dancefloor (album). \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 23:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dangerous (Cascada song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable single per WP:NSONGS, and almost no information (actually, only written information is about the music video). All previous Cascada singles have charted, and are consequently notable, but this one has not. Article has been prodded before (and the tag was removed by the creator a while ago), and even though there's a "major edit" template on it, I don't believe we should take it into consideration, because last time it was placed on top of the article, no "major edits" were made. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 15:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Protected Redirect to Album. The whole reason the article exists is because some believe it will be the next single based on the fact that there is a music video and that Natalie Horler supposedly said so at a concert. Whether it is or not, there is no information about it. It's not released yet, there's no date announced that we should expect it, and all there really is to say is that it could be the next single and there is a video. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 15:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, WP:CRYSTAL is also requesting it to be deleted. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 15:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Evacuate the Dancefloor (album). WP:CRYSTAL. Probably protected, too, because of the last AFD & subsequent recreation. Just because a music video is released for a song does not mean it's a single. Fails WP:NSONGS; no charts. talking birds 16:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep next UK single, release date 28th September Mister sparky (talk) 00:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That does not appear to be a reliable source. talking birds 21:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete......again as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS.
~~Keep~~ another uk release source and this one is definitely reliable Mister sparky (talk) 00:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please only vote once in an Articles for deletion discussion. Even if this is a planned single, it does not pass WP:NSONGS for lack of third-party coverage. talking birds 01:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well as it is a confirmed release it will do when it charts in just over a weeks time, so its pointless deleting the article just for it to be recreated after a week. Mister sparky (talk) 16:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite correct, but just imagine what would become of Wikipedia if people start creating articles based on a future notability... Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 19:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep added links from other sources including the CD single on Amazon. I believe they are waiting for the record company to finalize release date before making it available for pre-order. 77.100.60.38 (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The release date is now on Amazon and the single is available for pre-order. Surely there is now enough information and sources to stop this being deleted. 77.100.60.38 (talk) 10:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Evacuate the Dancefloor (album) per WP:CRYSTAL. Once it is released or once adequate reliable sources are added it can be restored. Rlendog (talk) 19:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And the title seems appropriate under WP:DAB, even for a redirect. Rlendog (talk) 19:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.