Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Dinh
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Team SoloMid. North America1000 22:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dan Dinh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim of significance aside from being the COO of a company and the brother of a notable former esports player. I could not find any secondary or tertiary sources for this individual, and this article is only sourced by primary sources which do not attest as to why this individual is notable. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: not notable person, poorly sourced. Ctrlwiki (talk) 23:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Team SoloMid. Fails WP:BIO per nom and WP:INHERIT. SBKSPP (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Changed my vote per BriefEdits's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 00:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect: Seems like he's big in the scene but struggles with sources that Wikipedia finds to be reliable (I.e. reputable publications, non-interviews, etc.). As most coverage appears to be related to Team SoloMid, a redirect will probably be more useful than a delete. — BriefEdits (talk) 22:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Team SoloMid. Search suggests that he is the COO of the company and a part of their roster. --Lenticel (talk) 01:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Team SoloMid. As the Chief Operating Officer, he is sufficiently notable to warrant a redirect even if a lack of sources demonstrate insufficient notability for a standalone article. Such-change47 (talk) 02:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Not a "reliable source" but Leaguepedia is a good repository of esports information related to League of Legends. According to Dan Dinh's article on the wiki, he has never played for a professional team (i.e. in a major professional league), and was never the head coach for a professional team (only one of several coaches for his brother's organisation TSM and later Cloud9). I honestly think it is a stretch to say his notability is only hampered by a lack of sources that Wikipedia deems reliable, as that would imply there are "unreliable" secondary mentions. However, this is not the case. Dan has not involved himself in the esports scene in any significant way since 2014, and his position was given to him by his brother, who is the CEO. The number of Google results are also due to "Dan Dinh" being a common name; a quick navigation of the results will give you many different Dan Dinhs. CentreLeftRight ✉ 02:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect: Per above. Esports coverage, especially esports coverage in the early 2010s, was almost non-existent, so while Reginald is notable as he was able to permeate that media desert, Dan Dinh is not. Curbon7 (talk) 06:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.