Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Lenticel ^(talk) 02:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crossball

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally prodded this article, but another New Page patroller, Hasteur (talk · contribs), declined my prod, stating that the content should be merged into the Four square article. The problem is that there is no evidence (WP:V) that this is something that was not just WP:MADEUP one day. If you Google "Crossball" it only returns mentions that this is a combination between lacrosse and baseball, certainly not foursquare with a tennis ball. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Crossball" seems to have referred to a number of different things over the years, including this and this as well as the lacrosse-baseball game described above, so I can't see it as a redirect to foursquare. Mandsford 14:47, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiManOne (talk • contribs) 23:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was the objection to the PROD, and tried to get the deletion discussion tabled untill the author responded to questions. I stayed out of the discussion during the first listing because I was unsure. Now that the article has sat for 7 days and the author has not come back (at least from what I can tell) I'm removing my previous objection and now voting delete. No improvement has occured on the article since AfD other than me putting some categories on it to attract attention. Hasteur (talk) 00:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.