Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Hurley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Connor Hurley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable amateur player who fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. What coverage has been found is routine. DJSasso (talk) 13:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All of his appearances were in youth and/or college leagues and he was only a 2nd round NHL Entry Draft pick. He clearly does not pass any of the criteria laid out in WP:NHOCKEY. Regarding general coverage I couldnt found anything substantial which covered him as person in a significant way. All mentions of his name occur as part of routine coverage e.g. in match, transfer or draft reports/lists. As he fails WP:GNG too the article should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary (talk) 21:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable, as stated above. In its use of "currently" and "is", the article is dated, and likely is no longer maintained. Kablammo (talk) 13:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY. However, I should remind editors on this discussion that the fact that an article is poorly written and/or out of date is not, in and of itself, reason for deletion. Smartyllama (talk) 19:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)][reply]
Delete - fails NHOCKEY and not finding much coverage. Rlendog (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.