Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Byers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:27, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Connor Byers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this boy (Just starting his senior year in high school) is obviously industrious, but unfortunately not notable. There are virtually no reliable sources discussing him, and although he is to be lauded for his efforts, starting your own label is akin to self publishing a book. Fails BASIC, ANYBIO, GNG, and NMUSIC. John from Idegon (talk) 01:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia_(U.S._state)-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:02, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, with notability unable to be established. 100k Youtube views and #192 on iTunes might marginally establish significance, but independent coverage in reliable sources is minimal to nonexistent. — Alpha3031 (talk | contribs) 05:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, self-punblish musician that fails MUSICBIO and well as GNG/BASIC. Sam Sailor 07:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this article comes across as too promotional. Vorbee (talk) 15:51, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG, and they clearly do not meet any of the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.