Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cobalt Flux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move‎ to Cobalt Flux Pad. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cobalt Flux

Cobalt Flux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most information uncited, fails WP:SIRS DirtyHarry991 (talk) 02:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 02:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance, Technology, and Utah. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Cobalt Flux Pad. The company is not notable but their product does appear to be barely notable, so the "dance platform" section needs to be tweaked so it's the main subject of the article, not the company. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I've now added enough sources to the article to pass WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Move per Zxcvbnm. Nice work redoing the article. I agree the dancepad itself is probably notable enough for a standalone article. CurlyWi (talk) 02:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.