Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Schwieren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify as there is simultaneous consensus that is isn't currently notable, but that he might be within draftification's six month time table. Keeping it around for draftspace incubation also preserves the history and attribution as well as avoiding starting from scratch. Star Mississippi 14:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Schwieren

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't establish claim of notability. Although I can find one article focusing on the player, I don't think there's enough significant coverage.

The player isn't capped internationally and hasn't played professionally so doesn't seem to meet NFOOTY. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 15:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Germany. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 15:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Please note that NFOOTBALL no longer exists. Giant Snowman 18:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:SPORTCRIT with this. Also was called up to recent national team training camp - but team has not played a match in about a year. With Nations League call-ups in a week or two, will be interesting to see - suggest also apply WP:NORUSH to see what happens. Nfitz (talk) 07:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Someone needs to be the subject of multiple sources to meet SPORTCRIT. As mentioned in the nomination, I found the one article, but nothing else. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 09:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:MarchOfTheGreyhounds, SPORTCRIT (final bullet) says "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject". Whether meeting SPORTCRIT is enough is a different issue - but I don't see how there's any doubt that SPORTCRIT isn't met. Nfitz (talk) 16:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I concede I was wrong on this, my apologies. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You missed the second sentence of WP:SPORTCRIT: Meeting this requirement alone does not indicate notability, but it does indicate that there are likely sufficient sources to merit a stand-alone article. A single source is enough to prevent a PROD, but not enough to keep an article at WP:AFD if no additional sources can be found. I'm also not convinced the article you provided is WP:SIGCOV; it only has three paragraphs of independent coverage, and those paragraphs include very little information beyond basic statistics. BilledMammal (talk) 23:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Draft It is likely that he will be notable in the near future. It's weather or not someone is willing to maintain a draft until then. Please note I am not volunteering. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; fails WP:GNG and may also fail WP:SPORTCRIT #5. BilledMammal (talk) 23:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or draftify - article about non-notable footballer (case of WP:TOOSOON). Jogurney (talk) 14:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.