Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Mannix

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Mannix

Chris Mannix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources, just his Sports Illustrated employer. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Journalism. Shellwood (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Sports. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I think the article is written well but the content isn't backed by sources. 182.191.220.58 (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete we should not have articles solely sourced to publications of an individual's employer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Most of the top links on google are bios from his various employers. Then there are the links that are about a character from "The Hateful Eight". This person has not received enough independent coverage to pass our notability guidelines. Rockphed (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.