Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chester Larson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Brandon (talk) 20:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chester Larson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable deputy sheriff who was died in 1969. Google News Archive returns some results; however, this should be deleted because the subject is notable for only one event, his death. Wikipedia is not a memorial. I cannot find any coverage of him before he died. Cunard (talk) 06:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I agree, sorry to say. This has become an all to common an occurrence. Though considered notable 50years ago, has become just a news item for a day or two, and only a local news item at that. And Wikipedia is not a news service. Typically I would have said merge into the Ventura County Sheriff's Department, however, these officers are alreay listed there and memorlised. ShoesssS ^Talk 06:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Wikipedia is not a memorial. Crafty (talk) 06:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per WP:N/CA#Victims. Clubmarx (talk) 14:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Wikipedia is not a memorial. Joe Chill (talk) 15:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not notable. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:N/CA#Victims. Very closely related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryce Patten. I'm OK with the mention at Ventura County Sheriff's Department and would not object to a redirect.Location (talk) 07:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. —Location (talk) 03:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.