Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Rodney Chandler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Rodney Chandler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim to or evidence of notability, fails WP:BIO. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 07:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: An interesting story and a borderline case. Contrary to the article's claim that he was a CIA spy the sources claim that the terrorists considered him a Viet Nam "war criminal." He is known only for his unfortunate death, but his story was covered by reliable media in English and Spanish/Portuguese. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:10, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as he fails WP:VICTIM and WP:ONEVENT. If his murder is notable, an article on it might be warranted. Claritas § 10:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Claritas. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A shame, but he doesn't pass any part of WP:BIO. His murder has plenty of coverage but doesn't seem to have had any meaningful repercussion beyond his family. At some point in time he might get his name mentioned in History_of_Brazil#Military_response. Bigger digger (talk) 01:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.