Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantinelle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chantinelle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This articles relies heavily on primary sources and there is no evidence to indicate its notability. Northern Escapee (talk) 17:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northern Escapee (talk) 17:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -2pou (talk) 20:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per failing WP:FICT, WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. The article, in its current form, is a largely unsourced plot summary of the fictional character, which is not significantly covered in any reliable sources. A redirect to Hellblazer is possible. --Dps04 (talk) 11:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Lack of reliable sources to meet WP:WAF and WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 20:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I prodded it with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. " so obviously I support deletion, but I don't see why the nom couldn't just wait for the PROD to be accepted or declined? If it was accepted it would have spared us the discussion here, and so far there are no arguments from anyone trying to save it, nor such arguments have been presented after my PROD. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.