Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Fitzgerald (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tom Fitzgerald (ice hockey)#Personal. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Casey Fitzgerald (ice hockey)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only thing notable about this guy (so far) is his relatives.18abruce (talk) 12:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He was named to the Hockey East All-Rookie team last year and has a high probability of meeting WP:NHOCKEY requirement #4 or #6 this season or next. There is also a significant amount of news coverage for him from NCAA hockey sources, for WP:GNG requirements. Mushh94 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tom Fitzgerald (ice hockey)#Personal, where Casey is discussed, consistent with the result of his brother's article's Afd a few months ago, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Fitzgerald (ice hockey). He may become notable in the future but I don't think he is there yet, so this should be a redirect until and unless he becomes notable. Rlendog (talk) 21:34, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per Rlendog. -DJSasso (talk) 16:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Per Rlendog. That seems to be the norm in cases like this. He's clearly not notable, but it's a plausible search term. Smartyllama (talk) 20:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.