Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain obvious
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDILY DELETED as CSD G4. User:LinguistAtLarge was doing something with this; I've userfied it to User:LinguistAtLarge/Captain obvious. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 21:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Captain obvious
- Captain obvious (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced slang term. Prodded; deprodder removed the unreferenced tag but did not add references. —C.Fred (talk) 20:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep (or transwiki to Wiktionary as an alternate) – This looks like this would be a notable enough of a term for inclusion in either Wiki. MuZemike 21:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A Wikipedia article on this topic has previously been deleted (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (3rd nomination)), and Wiktionary has a good definition already (wikt:Captain Obvious). EALacey (talk) 22:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a slang guide. Powers T 23:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- fr33kman -s- 15:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- fr33kman -s- 15:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.