Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caleb Holley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 00:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caleb Holley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. Has not made an active roster, not currently on an NFL roster Edday1051 (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I see nothing to suggest keeping and improving. SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Will come back to evaluate, but a quick note that I am finding some coverage, including (1) this from The Ada News, (2) this and (3) this from the Alaska Dispatch News, (4) this, (5) this, and (6) this from The Oklahoman, and (7) this from KXII. Cbl62 (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Cbl62's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 02:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article is in bad shape, but the sources referenced above are sufficient to pass WP:GNG. Hopefully, someone (any East Central fans out there?) can add the sources and adopt this article for improvement. Cbl62 (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.