Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brown Eyes (Lady Gaga Song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus clearly delete Nja²⁴⁷ 07:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brown Eyes (Lady Gaga Song)

A completely unsourced and unverified fancruft. The creater is resorting to vandalism of the other articles of this singer by inserting this article continnuously. This should be deleted. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Major violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Wish we could find a way of stopping these before they are created. --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 06:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Fame (album). WP:BALL does apply, but it's still a (non-notable) song on the album. In retrospect, I should have explained more clearly to the creator why I did the redir in the first place, but it should be clear to them by now that their behaviour is not acceptable. decltype (talk) 06:31, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think a delete of the page followed by blocking of the page creation should be appropriate since inspite of the deletion tags the user is still continuing to resort to vandalism. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete it plz and i was confirmed on interscope and in her interview i had with her ok plz don't get rid of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TDTH (talk • contribs) 07:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. You need to provide reliable sources for it. Or else it will be deleted. And a blatant attack on my talk page doesnot help things either. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL. - eo (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TDTH here-Look i have contacts who have contacts in which my friend just called up interscope and red one verifying it's contents in which they claim it is a true single and most proberly the last since Gaga is already producing her new album in which is claim on a red one interview ok i have contacts if you don't believe me i will come to you personaly to explain ok it is true and i never lie.(that interview was true she was doing a competion on her tour in USA with was a interveiw in which i won ok) Soz about the blandishment but it is true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.74.142 (talk) 09:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TDTH-Plz i beg you it is true im telling you plz don't get rid of it i lov Gaga don't delete her plz oh and i saw paparazzi its a hot video so far and poker face is 3rd for me 4th is just dance with her visachies 5th bdr and 2nd love game and good is eh eh but any way, plz don't deleate something of her(well it's not hers but it is her next single and a song she made on the fame). I lov Gaga and its one of her personal favorites ok i know the record companys and lady gaga I beg you plz don't get rid of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.250.137 (talk) 10:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we got a case of a fanatic. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TDTH-Whats fantic??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TDTH (talk • contribs) 10:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TDTH-Im not frantic and what will it take to keep it non-deleted and to post it on the fame and stuff becuase i told you the truth ok im dying to keep it and to enhance the fame and stuff ok. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TDTH (talk • contribs) 10:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TDTH-PLZPLZPLZPLZPLZPLZ[PLZPLZPLZPLZPLZ dont get rid of it for it is the next single even people i know have seen it i posted it on my myspace and over 367 peolple have seen it and started gettiong it ok it's not a hoex and not lies it TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. (I had to take it of beacuse of you you know ok just keep it and let me put it in the fame article and stuff ok thats all i ask i beg i will do anything im telling the truth). —Preceding unsigned comment added by TDTH (talk • contribs) 10:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is a simple case of WP:CRYSTAL. FFMG (talk) 10:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No references, delete as per WP:CRYSTAL Trevor Marron (talk) 10:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:CRYSTAL violation.—Kww(talk) 11:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not only is it non-notable per other editor's reasonings but if what TDTH says about the comments coming from a personal interview then it's an unhealthy dose of WP:OR too. --Web Hamster 13:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'll concede that in its present form it violates this "Crystal" policy. However, instead of proposing that it ever be deleted, did anyone ever consider simply deleting the parts that brought it into conflict with the policy in the first place. I wonder why people seem so eager to delete everything as soon as it is created. That kind of response could have a chilling effect on people even submitting articles. I do feel that this topic is notable because Lady Gaga is a very prominent entertainer right now, and, this does seem to be a song on her album. So, clean up the parts of the article that violate "Crystal" and leave it up. It is a notable topic and deserves an article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Genovese12345 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was tried. Also, according to WP:MUSIC, "a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". I do not know the subject matter very well, but since the nom (who has worked on several Lady GaGa-related articles) endorses the deletion, I would assume that the song is relatively insignificant. decltype (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry but there is not at all anything that will allow to keep this article. I personally edit the Gaga related articles and people there know my work. Hence I myself state that this needs to be deleted asap, a deep case of a fanatic devicing imageries to support statements. If this indeed would have been a single, then why no media representation? And is it not clear from the creater's rantings that how much a case of fanaticism this is? --Legolas ^(talk2me) 16:30, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unverified single. Violates WP:BALL, WP:V and WP:NM. There's nothing in the text that merits an article for this song. — Σ xplicit 21:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable song and no sourced content to merge with the album. Rlendog (talk) 03:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, nothing to merge due to the lack of WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 00:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.