Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brocagh Emmetts GAC (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brocagh Emmetts GAC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted through AfD a few years ago, so not eligible for prod. Recently recreated without a single ref from an independent reliable source. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:51, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Going to have to agree with onel5969. Not notable enough for its own article space, doesn't pass WP:GNG. Spf121188 (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it covers SIGCOV I found here. --NeverTry4Me - TT page 10:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Arunudoy, your link is literally just a google search. Can you point to reliable, independent, specific coverage that would signify legitimate coverage? I'm asking because if you have those, I would possibly strike my !vote. Spf121188 (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the only sources available seem to be either primary sources or directory listings. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.